The Myths of Medical Malpractice


Greg Monforton

The topic of medical malpractice is much publicized, but it is not well understood by most people.

What seemed impossible just ten years ago is now routine medical procedure. This helps us all to live healthier and longer lives. However, these astonishing medical advances have created increasing public expectations of the medical profession.

Many people wrongly believe that medical malpractice occurs whenever a doctor makes a mistake while treating a patient and that patient suffers injury or harm. However, a doctor is responsible only when his or her conduct falls below the standard of care expected of a “reasonably competent” doctor. This standard of care is continually changing as medical advances are made. Also, a higher standard is expected of a specialist than is expected of a general practitioner.

Well over 90 percent of lawsuits result in an out-of-court settlement, with an actual trial never even taking place. However, this is not the case with malpractice claims. Canadian doctors usually belong to an organization called the Canadian Medical Protective Association. This organization is composed of doctors who administer all malpractice claims brought against their members. Although some malpractice cases do settle out of court, most are contested to the very end.

Generally, medical malpractice is proven by the testimony of another qualified and impartial doctor. Many people believe that a “conspiracy of silence” exists and that it is impossible to get a doctor to “blow the whistle”, on another doctor. The vast majority of doctors are highly qualified and conscientious individuals dedicated to maintaining and preserving the highest possible standards for their profession. Most doctors are prepared to testify in court if necessary to prevent sub-standard medical care.

There are very short time limits within which lawsuits against medical professionals must be started. For example, lawsuits against public hospital and nurses must be commenced within two years after the patient is discharged from or ceases to receive treatment from the hospital. A malpractice claim against a doctor must be brought within one year from when the person knew or ought reasonably to have known the facts which give rise to his allegation of malpractice.

Car Accidents

Steps to Take in the Aftermath of a Car Accident

Car Accident Victims Require Legal Assistance

Facts of Accident Determine Time Length to Sue

Hit Brakes Early and Avoid a Tort

Consumer

Verbal Pact Can Be as Firm as Written One

Risk and Spectator Sports

Draft System Controls Players

The Myths of Medical Malpractice

Legal System

Facts Determine Calculation of Damages

What Is an Injunction?

The Lawyer's Duty of Confidentiality

The Importance of Jury Duty

Evidence in the Courtroom

The Ins and Outs of Legal Fees

Military Law

The September 11, 2001 Victim Compensation Fund

The Origin of Canadian Law

The Supreme Court of Canada

Expert Witness Testimony

Property and Real Estate

Snow and Ice Removal: Duty of Property Owners

Traffic Law

One Need Not Intend To Drive Dangerous To Be Found Guilty of Dangerous Driving

Employment Law

What Is Wrongful Dismissal?

Animals

Libel and Slander

Criminal Law

Laws Boost Victims' Rights

Silence Is Golden

Charges Possible in Hockey Attacks

Constitutional Law

Libel and Slander